Prove the agreed fixes actually landed.
Retest previously identified findings and record whether each item is resolved, partially remediated, still open or accepted.
Final pricing is confirmed after a short scope review.
Verification is the difference between a plan and a result.
A finding list is only useful if someone checks whether the work was completed. This service retests agreed items and uses precise status language so stakeholders can see progress without overstating certainty.
What we verify
- Agreed previously identified findings
- Named systems associated with those findings
- The original assessment method, where still valid
- Authorised access required to retest
- Exclusions and testing windows
- Status recording for each item
Verification does not expand into a full new assessment unless that broader work is separately scoped and authorised.
Status that stays honest.
Each retested item is described with language that matches the evidence. The goal is a defensible record, not a marketing claim that everything is now safe.
Evidence your team can use.
Clear documentation for leadership, technical teams and stakeholders who need to understand the assessment outcome.
View a Sample ReportA controlled path from scope to verification.
You know what is happening, why it is happening and what comes next at each stage.
Confirm the list
Agree which findings are in scope and whether original evidence is sufficient to retest them.
Authorise access
Confirm the systems, credentials and testing window needed for verification.
Retest
Repeat the relevant checks against the agreed items only.
Record status
Mark each item as resolved, partial, open, accepted or not verified.
Explain remaining risk
Where an item remains open, keep the recommendation specific and usable.
Hand over evidence
Provide a verification record your team can share internally.
Verification is not a clean bill of health.
Closing agreed findings shows that those specific issues were retested. It does not mean the environment is free of other weaknesses, and it is not a substitute for a new assessment when systems have changed substantially.
If you need a fresh baseline rather than a retest, an external, internal or combined assessment is the more accurate starting point.
Verification pricing depends on the number of agreed findings, the systems involved, access method and the quality of the original evidence. A fixed proposal is provided before retesting begins.
What to know before the assessment.
Is this a new vulnerability assessment?
What if we have not had a Vensora assessment before?
Does a closed finding mean the organisation is secure?
How is pricing determined?
Can this support customer or insurance evidence?
Turn remediation work into evidence.
Share the findings you need verified. We will confirm what can be retested and provide a scoped proposal before any activity begins.